Do your lab results fit the pattern?
|
Hey Reader, Dr Karl here. The part that matters most: where they deviate. When your data sits where the pattern says it shouldn’t for someone with your profile, that’s not noise. That’s the signal — the thing worth chasing. A reference range can never show you that, because a reference range compares you to everyone. I compare your lab results to each other NOT TO A GENERIC RANGE for that single lab test.
My glucose is in the pre-diabetic range.
Notice the different patterns between Non IR (non insulin resistant) and IR-people (insulin resistant) groups. They have completely separate patterns …. How’s that possible? “Set against people like me, my pattern lands squarely in the non-insulin-resistant group; that ‘pre-diabetic’ glucose isn’t what it looks like”
One more thing worth mentioning. This past year I wrote two books on exactly this — how to read the relationships in your own Lab work instead of chasing one value at a time. The thinking on the table is now written down. Another book is on the way for even more granular lab data pattern interpretation to aid you in your pursuit of understanding your health. I’ll send a couple more notes in the coming weeks on what these overlays reveal. If you already want your numbers read against the dataset again with new lab work, just reply. I read every reply myself. To your health,
Links to our published books are on our website |
Free
Three numbers your doctor called normal
Four pages on three pairs of numbers you have almost certainly had run already: glucose with insulin, triglycerides with HDL, homocysteine with B12 and folate. Read one at a time, each one comes back normal. Read as pairs, they say something else.
Or if you would rather talk it through, the 20-minute call is free. I will tell you on the call if this is not a fit.




